Dany Ome Under Fire for Declining to Sing Against 'Dictatorships'

What Happened

Cuban reggaeton singer Dany Ome has ignited a significant controversy following an interview where he declared he would not perform songs against "any dictatorship," asserting his identity as a singer above all else.

His statements, which quickly went viral on social media, have drawn considerable criticism, particularly from the Cuban exile community.

Where and When

The declarations were made recently during an interview, as reported by CubitaNOW on February 27, 2026. Dany Ome, who currently resides in the United States, made these remarks concerning his stance on political activism through music.

Why It Matters

Dany Ome's comments are particularly sensitive given his family background. His refusal to engage in anti-regime songs is seen by many as a contradiction to his heritage.

The controversy highlights the ongoing debate about the role of artists in political contexts, especially concerning Cuba. It raises questions about whether public figures should use their platforms to address their country's situation or remain politically neutral.

What The Parties Say

Dany Ome stated, "I really don't have to make a song for any dictatorship... I am a singer." He also mentioned that his mother previously took on the fight against the Cuban regime and that he prefers to focus solely on his musical career.

Critics, however, have questioned his position, with many taking to social media to express their disapproval and even call for boycotts. His family's history of activism against the Cuban government, including his mother's involvement with the Ladies in White and his father's past political imprisonment, is often cited.

What Comes Next

The debate continues online, reflecting the deep emotions surrounding the Cuban situation, particularly when the commentary comes from individuals with ties to activism and exile.

While some defend the artist's right to separate his music from politics, focusing on his festive and personal themes, others feel public figures with large audiences have a responsibility to take clearer stances.